Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Motorola One 5G's 84.6 score. Galaxy A32's construction is a little bit thicker but just a little lighter than the Motorola One 5G, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Motorola One 5G has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because it has way more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2520. Motorola One 5G counts with more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a battery duration that's just as good as Motorola One 5G's battery life. Motorola One 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.