Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than the Motorola One 5G, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is an older device than the Motorola One 5G, but it's a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G and Motorola One 5G feature similar displays, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a just a bit lower pixel density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, they both have a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same back camera sensor size.
The Motorola One 5G has a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.