Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 84.6 score against 77.8. Although the Motorola One 5G is much older and thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter. Motorola One 5G has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger display and a little greater pixel number per inch of screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola One 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola One 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video resolution and a camera in the back with more megapixels.
The Motorola One 5G is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.