Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is slightly better than Motorola One Action, getting an 85 score against 78.5. The iPhone 8 construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Action, even though it was released about a year before. The Apple iPhone 8 and Motorola One Action both have very similar displays, although the Apple iPhone 8 has a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a lot worse pixel density and a much smaller display.
Motorola One Action features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Apple iPhone 8 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 8 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 8 also has higher 60 fps video frame rates. Motorola One Action counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 92 percent more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.