Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, with a global score of 84.5 against 78.5. Even though the Apple iPhone XS Max is older and heavier than Motorola One Action, it's body is still thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because it has a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The iPhone XS Max has a better processor than Motorola One Action, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone XS Max has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video definition and a same resolution camera, the iPhone XS Max also has faster video frame rate.
The Motorola One Action features a much better storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action features a little better battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3179mAh.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Action, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.