Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 global score. Although the Google Nexus 6P is much older and a bit heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. The Google Nexus 6P features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a just a bit better count of pixels per screen inch.
Motorola One Action counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Action has just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola One Action also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Action and Google Nexus 6P have very similar batteries, although the Google Nexus 6P has just 3450mAh of battery size against 3500mAh. Google Nexus 6P shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a back facing camera with a better resolution.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola One Action, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.