Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, having a overall score of 81.6 against 78.5. The Google Pixel 2 construction is lighter and thinner than Motorola One Action, although it was released around 22 months before. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
The Motorola One Action features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Action. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola One Action counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 2 also has a more mega-pixels camera.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.