Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, having a global score of 81.3 against 78.5. The Google Pixel XL is an much older cellphone than the Motorola One Action, but Google could make it a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action has a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Action also has a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel XL features a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a more MP camera.
The Google Pixel XL and Motorola One Action both count with really similar batteries, although the Google Pixel XL has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Action, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.