Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a little bit better than the LG V20, getting a 78.5 score against 77. Although Motorola One Action is noticeably newer than the LG V20, it is a little heavier and thicker. The LG V20 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a just a bit higher pixels amount per screen inch.
The Motorola One Action counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One Action has a bit better performance than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has a larger number of cores.
Motorola One Action has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The LG V20 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V20 also has a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola One Action, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.