Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's general score of 78.5. The LG V50 ThinQ design is just a little heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Action, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Action, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch and a bit bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.