Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 78.5 against 76.4. The Motorola One Action is a thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but both have the same weight. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola One Action has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Action, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.