Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a general score of 78.5 against 77.9. Motorola One Action's design weights the same than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's somewhat thinner. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little better performance than Motorola One Action, because although it has a lower number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better screen pixel density. The Motorola One Action has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.