Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 435 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a somewhat heavier device than the Motorola One Action, but they are equally thin. Motorola One Action features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A32. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Action counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a way higher amount of pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Action counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. Galaxy A32 captures better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.