Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Motorola One Action, with a 91.8 score against 78.5. Although Galaxy A71 5G is a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. The Galaxy A71 5G features a little better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Motorola One Action, both of them have equal internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has improved battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs more money than Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.