Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is slightly better than the Motorola One Action, having an 84.9 score against 78.5. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A80 construction is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola One Action. Motorola One Action features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a little higher screen pixel density.
The Motorola One Action counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a little better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.