Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's construction is somewhat heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola One Action, and they were only released 1 months apart. Motorola One Action features just a bit better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures way better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Motorola One Action features a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.