Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, with an 81 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is notably thinner than the Motorola One Action, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. The Motorola One Action counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little better pixels density.
Motorola One Action features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola One Action has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.