Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Although the Motorola One Action is way older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. The Motorola One Action has an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Action, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One Action not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.