Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. The iPhone 8 is an notably older device than the Motorola One Hyper, but Apple managed to build it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone 8 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a really smaller screen, a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a bit lower screen density. Motorola One Hyper has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 120% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 8, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.