Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. Even though the iPhone XS Max is older and a little heavier than Motorola One Hyper, it's body is still thinner. The iPhone XS Max counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone XS Max also has a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper has much more storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper features longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3179mAh.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.