Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Google Nexus 6P's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, although it was released many years before. Google Nexus 6P counts with a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Google Nexus 6P has a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Motorola One Hyper, and although the Google Nexus 6P has 1 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.