Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a general score of 81.6 against 79.8. The Google Pixel 2 construction is thinner and much lighter than Motorola One Hyper, although it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.