Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 81.3 against 79.8. Google Pixel XL is an noticeably older phone than Motorola One Hyper, but Google managed to build it a little bit thinner and lighter. Motorola One Hyper features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more cores.
Google Pixel XL has just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel number per inch in the display. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.