Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, with a 79.8 score against 77. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is much newer than HTC U Ultra, it's thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen density.
The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Hyper has a bit faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower).
The Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola One Hyper is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.