Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the LG V20, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77. Motorola One Hyper's body is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than LG V20. LG V20 features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels density.
Motorola One Hyper has a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit better CPU than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V20, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.