Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the LG V30, getting a score of 79.8 against 79.1. The Motorola One Hyper body is newer than LG V30's, although it's thicker and incredibly heavier. LG V30 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG V30 features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Motorola One Hyper has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more MP back camera.
Motorola One Hyper has better battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a little more than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V30. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V30, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.