Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Although LG V50 ThinQ and the Motorola One Hyper were released with only 7 months difference, LG V50 ThinQ is just a little thinner and just a little lighter.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery life in Motorola One Hyper.
Motorola One Hyper takes better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low-light situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.