Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 79.8 score against 76.4. Even though Motorola One Hyper is heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and also much newer. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a lot better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger diafragm aperture, faster 30 fps video frame rates and a lot more megapixels back camera. Motorola One Hyper has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.