Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. Motorola One Hyper's body is incredibly newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features an incredibly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has better video frame rates, a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.