Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting an 81.2 score against 79.8. The Motorola Edge 50 is a way newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola One Hyper. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit greater screen density. Motorola One Hyper has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. Motorola Edge 50 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.