Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 350.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. Although the Motorola One Hyper and Moto G Stylus were only released 4 months apart, Motorola One Hyper's design is just a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner. Both phones in this review include the same Android 11 OS.
Moto G Stylus has a display that's just as good as the Motorola One Hyper one, because although the Moto G Stylus has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2300px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen. The Motorola One Hyper and the Motorola Moto G Stylus count with similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Moto G Stylus counts with a battery duration that is very similar to Motorola One Hyper's battery performance.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G Stylus, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.