Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Motorola One Hyper's construction is way newer, but way thicker and way heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Hyper counts with slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger camera aperture and a much better resolution camera.
The Motorola One Hyper not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.