Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 Star is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a global score of 82.1 against 79.8. Although the Galaxy A8 Star is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's design is thinner and a little lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A8 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a little faster processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A8 Star and Motorola One Hyper feature quite similar screens, although the Galaxy A8 Star has a quite smaller display, a quite lower screen density and a quite lower 1080 x 2220 resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.