Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than the Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 operating system. Although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Motorola One Hyper were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is just a bit thinner but also a bit heavier than Motorola One Hyper.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a lower video resolution, a smaller aperture and a way less mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.