Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, with an 81 score against 79.8. The Galaxy C9 Pro is an notably older cellphone than Motorola One Hyper, but it is noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, providing you some extra features.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little greater pixels amount per inch in the display, a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's CPU is just as good as the Motorola One Hyper one, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola One Hyper have very similar batteries performance. Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way higher (4K) video resolution and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.