Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having an 87.1 score against 79.8. Galaxy Note9's body has the same thickness than the Motorola One Hyper, but it is a bit heavier. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Motorola One Hyper features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola One Hyper and Samsung Galaxy Note9 have really similar battery performance. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a lot tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy Note9 is more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.