Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 79.3. Although Motorola One Hyper is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it is much thicker and notably heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has 7 more CPU cores (although slower). Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better screen pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels. Motorola One Hyper has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola One Hyper is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.