Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. The Motorola One Hyper is a incredibly older and much thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola could make it just a little lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a little bit higher pixels density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a way lower 50 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with more storage for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Motorola One Hyper is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.