Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with a overall score of 79.8 against 78.8. The Motorola One Hyper body is older, heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X60 Pro. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical operating system features.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola One Hyper features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower video definition and a way worse 48 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.