Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than the Motorola One Macro, with a global score of 84.5 against 73.8. Despite of the fact the iPhone XS Max is older and somewhat heavier than the Motorola One Macro, it's body is still thinner. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a much better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a lot better screen density.
Motorola One Macro counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola One Macro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone XS Max counts with a more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Macro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Motorola One Macro has better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The iPhone XS Max takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a way better video resolution and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.