Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Motorola One Macro, with a general score of 80.3 against 73.8. Despite of the fact that the Google Nexus 6P is noticeably older than the Motorola One Macro, it's design is thinner and a little bit lighter. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a sharper display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola One Macro has a bit better CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Macro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Nexus 6P features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F2 aperture, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a lot better video definition and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Motorola One Macro has a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Macro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.