Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is better than Motorola One Macro, having an 81.6 score against 73.8. Although Google Pixel 2 is older than Motorola One Macro, it's construction is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920.
Google Pixel 2 features just a little better performance than Motorola One Macro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM. The Motorola One Macro features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 2 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Motorola One Macro counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.