Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than Motorola One Macro's general score of 73.8. LG V50 ThinQ's body is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Macro, although they were only released 5 months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a much greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
LG V50 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in Motorola One Macro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.