Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Macro's 73.8 global score. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a older and much thicker phone than the Motorola One Macro, but Motorola managed to build it a bit lighter anyway.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much greater display density. Motorola Droid Turbo has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, because although it has less RAM and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Motorola Droid Turbo takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a much better video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. Motorola One Macro counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola One Macro features a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.