Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-10-12 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 271 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than the Motorola One Macro, with an 84.7 score against 73.8. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Motorola One Macro comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Although Galaxy A32 is newer than the Motorola One Macro, it is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
Motorola One Macro and Samsung Galaxy A32 count with similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has a just a bit worse pixel quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 720 x 1600 and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A32 has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola One Macro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.