Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-12 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola One Macro, getting a score of 81 against 73.8. Despite of the fact the Galaxy C9 Pro is much older and a bit heavier than the Motorola One Macro, it's construction is still much thinner. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Motorola One Macro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Macro features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Macro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a larger camera aperture and a better 16 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery performance is just as good as Motorola One Macro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.