Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Macro's 73.8 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an extremely older phone than Motorola One Macro, but Samsung made it somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a way better screen pixels density. The Motorola One Macro has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Macro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola One Macro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Macro also has more 2.1 gigahertz processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a back-facing camera with a higher resolution, a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Motorola One Macro has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.