Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-09-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Power, with an 81.6 score against 75.7. Google Pixel 2's design is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola One Power, even though it was released just 11 months before. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Power, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola One Power counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 2 has a little better processing power than Motorola One Power. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Motorola One Power has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One Power and Google Pixel 2 feature incredibly similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 2 has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lot lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.