Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the Motorola One Power, getting a score of 78.8 against 75.7. Even though Google Pixel 3a and Motorola One Power were released only 8 months apart, Google Pixel 3a is extremely lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The Google Pixel 3a has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Power. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 3a features a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Power, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density.
Motorola One Power and Google Pixel 3a count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Motorola One Power has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Power also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola One Power features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.