Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola One Power, getting a global score of 83.7 against 75.7. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Motorola One Power, even though both of them were only released 8 months apart. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Power, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a bit bigger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Power, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Power, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Motorola One Power features superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.